Solutions /
ESG consulting
ESG programs built to
survive their first audit
Materiality, governance and program design for companies moving from reactive compliance to a defensible ESG position.
120+
Programs designed
18 wk
Median engagement
100%
Assurance readiness at first attempt
Overview
From reactive compliance to a defensible position
Most ESG programs begin as a response to a questionnaire. We rebuild them around what is material to the business, then give the governance to match.
Benefits
Why a designed program
beats a reactive one
Six reasons companies that plan their ESG work spend less on it than companies that answer each request as it arrives.
Lower cost to comply
One controlled program answers every questionnaire, instead of a new project for each one.
Emissions actually fall
Material topics drive capital allocation, which is the only mechanism that moves a number.
Independent of the questionnaire
A position grounded in materiality survives a change of rating agency or customer.
Incentives and finance
Sustainability-linked facilities and grants require exactly the evidence a designed program produces.
Assurance without drama
Controls built in from the start make the first audit a review rather than a reconstruction.
Durable commitments
Targets the operating business agreed to are the ones still standing in year three.
Why we are
Advice that has to hold up in a room
Every recommendation we make is one we would defend to an auditor, a regulator and a hostile analyst on the same day.
Materiality first
What matters is established from evidence and stakeholders, not borrowed from a peer's report.
Operational buy-in
Targets are negotiated with the people who have to deliver them before they are published.
Documented judgment
Every methodological choice is written down with its reasoning, because it will be questioned.
Handover by design
Programs are built to be run by your team, with the documentation that makes that possible.
FAQs
Frequently asked
questions
Photovoltaic modules convert sunlight directly into direct current electricity, which an inverter converts to alternating current for your site or the grid. Output follows irradiance rather than demand, which is why we model your hourly load alongside the resource before fixing a system size.
Every engagement starts from your own data — interval meter readings, an asset register, or a year of on-site measurement — rather than from a template. The design that follows is sized to your load profile, site constraints and growth plan, and we show you the trade-offs we made on the way.
Advisory engagements usually run six to sixteen weeks. Built projects depend almost entirely on permitting and grid connection: a commercial rooftop can be energized inside a year, while utility-scale generation typically runs two to four years from site control to commercial operation.
Yes. We build the inventory, install the controls, map one data set out to whichever frameworks apply to you, and draft the disclosure itself. We also run assurance readiness reviews so the first engagement with an auditor is not the first time the process is tested.
We build the pathway from your asset register, aligning abatement to replacement cycles so you are not writing off working equipment. We also quantify the residual emissions honestly and help you procure durable removals against them, rather than assuming the last ten percent away.