Solutions /
Climate risk
Hazard data turned into
asset-level financial exposure
Physical and transition risk assessed at asset level, in financial terms, and written up for disclosure and for planning.
11,400
Assets screened
4
Scenarios modeled per portfolio
2050
Standard planning horizon
Overview
Risk expressed in money
A heat map is not a decision. We join hazard data to your own operational data so exposure arrives as a financial number a board can allocate against.
Benefits
Why exposure has to
reach a number
Six reasons quantified climate risk gets funded and qualitative climate risk does not.
Capital allocated well
Adaptation spending goes where exposure is largest rather than where concern is loudest.
Losses avoided
Sites identified early can be protected during a scheduled outage rather than after a flood.
Insurance conversations
Quantified exposure and mitigation evidence change what an insurer is willing to write.
Disclosure satisfied
Scenario analysis produced for planning also satisfies the climate sections of disclosure.
Resilient supply chains
Supplier sites screened alongside your own, because exposure rarely stops at the fence.
Decisions with lead time
Trigger conditions defined now mean adaptation starts before the risk materializes.
Why we are
Models you can interrogate
Climate risk work fails when nobody outside the modeling team can explain how a number was reached.
Asset-level resolution
Exposure computed per site, not smoothed across a region or a business unit.
Your own operational data
Hazard joined to your throughput, headcount and margin, which is what makes it financial.
Transparent assumptions
Every scenario choice documented, with sensitivity shown around the ones that matter.
Options with triggers
Adaptation written with costs, lead times and the conditions that should start the work.
FAQs
Frequently asked
questions
Photovoltaic modules convert sunlight directly into direct current electricity, which an inverter converts to alternating current for your site or the grid. Output follows irradiance rather than demand, which is why we model your hourly load alongside the resource before fixing a system size.
Every engagement starts from your own data — interval meter readings, an asset register, or a year of on-site measurement — rather than from a template. The design that follows is sized to your load profile, site constraints and growth plan, and we show you the trade-offs we made on the way.
Advisory engagements usually run six to sixteen weeks. Built projects depend almost entirely on permitting and grid connection: a commercial rooftop can be energized inside a year, while utility-scale generation typically runs two to four years from site control to commercial operation.
Yes. We build the inventory, install the controls, map one data set out to whichever frameworks apply to you, and draft the disclosure itself. We also run assurance readiness reviews so the first engagement with an auditor is not the first time the process is tested.
We build the pathway from your asset register, aligning abatement to replacement cycles so you are not writing off working equipment. We also quantify the residual emissions honestly and help you procure durable removals against them, rather than assuming the last ten percent away.